Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Rescue Plan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 2,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,375 of 37,536 keywords). This American Rescue Plan is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
American Rescue Plan
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%American Rescue Plan (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos