Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amentum Services Inc results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 1,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (16,431 of 56,322 keywords). This Amentum Services Inc is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Amentum Services Inc
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
71%Amentum Services Inc (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos