Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amc Sundial results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and False Dilemma, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 6,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,921 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (22,838 of 37,288 keywords). This Amc Sundial is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Amc Sundial
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
39%Amc Sundial (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,921
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos