Keyword summary
94%2 analyzed articles/videos487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ambassadors results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,047 hits. Analysis detected 7,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,781 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,493 of 37,536 keywords). This Ambassadors is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Ambassadors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Ambassadors (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,781
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.9%21.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos