Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Batula results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 3,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (17,543 of 34,833 keywords). This Amanda Batula is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Amanda Batula
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
50%Amanda Batula (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos