Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alvin Bragg results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 309 hits . Analysis detected 1,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of â 65% (13,456 of 37,536 keywords). This Alvin Bragg is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Alvin Bragg
Keyword details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst