Keyword summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alliance To Protect Delaware's Future results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 613 hits. Analysis detected 4,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (42,439 of 55,736 keywords). This Alliance To Protect Delaware's Future is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Alliance To Protect Delaware's Future
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos