Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Alicent Hightower results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.2% saturation with 1,625 hits. Analysis detected 4,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Alicent Hightower is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Alicent Hightower
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Alicent Hightower (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 58.2%58.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 58.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos