Keyword summary
41% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Simpson results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 866 hits . Analysis detected 4,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,292 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (34,902 of 55,179 keywords). This Al Simpson is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Al Simpson
Keyword details
Total words: 7,292
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst