Keyword summary
72%1 analyzed article/video687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aipac Donations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 743 hits. Analysis detected 4,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,822 of 36,750 keywords). This Aipac Donations is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Aipac Donations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
55%Aipac Donations (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,026
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos