Keyword summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aipac Donations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 4,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (16,889 of 36,915 keywords). This Aipac Donations is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Aipac Donations
Keyword details
Total words: 4,026
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst