Keyword summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Writing Detectors results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 3,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (11,012 of 37,374 keywords). This AI Writing Detectors is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
AI Writing Detectors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠71%AI Writing Detectors (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos