Keyword summary
30%1 analyzed article/video1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Law results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 2,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,241 of 37,536 keywords). This AI Law is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
AI Law
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
12%AI Law (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,614
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos