Keyword summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Computing results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 4,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,992 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (23,975 of 36,632 keywords). This AI Computing is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
AI Computing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠35%AI Computing (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,992
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos