Keyword summary
32%1 analyzed article/video1,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Accelerator results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 3,430 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,338 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,173 of 37,536 keywords). This AI Accelerator is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
AI Accelerator
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%AI Accelerator (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,338
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate