Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ahmed Nagi results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 3,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,251 of 37,536 keywords). This Ahmed Nagi is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Ahmed Nagi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Ahmed Nagi (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos