Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Age Caps results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,907 of 37,536 keywords). This Age Caps is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Age Caps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Age Caps (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos