Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 949 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Afib results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 3,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,857 of 37,536 keywords). This Afib is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Afib
Keyword details
Total words: 3,796
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst