Keyword summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 2,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Addiction Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 927 hits . Analysis detected 5,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,786 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (26,738 of 36,643 keywords). This Addiction Policy is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Addiction Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 6,786
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst