Keyword summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Act results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Bandwagon , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 125 hits . Analysis detected 478 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,426 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,661 of 37,536 keywords). This Act is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Act
Keyword details
Total words: 3,426
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst