Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Accelsius results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,342 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Accelsius is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Accelsius
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Accelsius (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,342
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.0%12.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos