Keyword summary
25%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abbvie Foundation Cancer Pavilion results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 1,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (35,539 of 55,304 keywords). This Abbvie Foundation Cancer Pavilion is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Abbvie Foundation Cancer Pavilion
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos