Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These $9 Billion Estimate results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 5,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,070 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,159 of 37,536 keywords). This $9 Billion Estimate is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
$9 Billion Estimate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%$9 Billion Estimate (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,070
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510094.3% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 43.9%43.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 43.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.6%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos