Keyword summary
85%2 analyzed articles/videos995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 5th Congressional District results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 4,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,670 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (28,570 of 58,096 keywords). This 5th Congressional District is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
5th Congressional District
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
51%5th Congressional District (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,670
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos