Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 4th Congressional District results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 890 hits. Analysis detected 4,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (8,407 of 37,530 keywords). This 4th Congressional District is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
4th Congressional District
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos