Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 10 27 25 Paper results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 77.4% saturation with 65 hits . Analysis detected 394 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of 100% (15 of 37,536 keywords). This 10 27 25 Paper is worse (more manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. 10 27 25 Paper
Keyword details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 100.0% percentile 52.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles84 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 67.9% 67.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 66.7% 66.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 77.4% 77.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 45.2% 45.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 45.2% 45.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 44.0% 44.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 45.2% 45.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 45.2% 45.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 32.1% 32.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Keyword 77.4%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 67.9%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 66.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 45.2%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 45.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 45.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 45.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 44.0%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst