Breitbart81%

WATCH: Patriotic Americans Party in D.C. Streets as Weather Threatens 4th of July Events: ‘It’s Time to Celebrate’ 49%

By Amy Furr64%

7/4/2026, 7:22:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 473 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,339 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the article peer group.

A crowd of Americans did not let a severe weather warning stop them from partying at the Salute to America event in Washington, DC, on the Fourth of July. 
Video footage from Salem News Channel showed the group dancing and having a good time on the street outside the event as thunder storms were moving through the area: 
Federal officials issued an evacuation alert Saturday evening while thousands of visitors were enjoying Fourth of July festivities on the National Mall, WUSA 9 reported. 
However, the outlet said in an update “The National Mall will reopen Saturday night after a weather-related evacuation interrupted Freedom 250 celebrations, the Great American State Fair and the annual Salute to America fireworks program.” 
The fireworks display was reportedly going to be the “largest” of its kind in American history, lasting 40 minutes and using 850,000 fireworks, according to Breitbart News. 
In a social media post at 6:32 p.m., Freedom 250 said federal authorities asked guests to evacuate the event grounds and seek shelter inside nearby buildings. 
“Available shelter locations include the Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Agriculture, Internal Revenue Service, VOA Building, Thomas Jefferson Memorial, National Museum of American History, National Museum of Natural History, the African American Museum, and the Ronald Reagan Building. 
Please remain calm, follow the directions of law enforcement and event staff, and stay tuned to Freedom 250's official channels for updates,” the organization said: 
The temperature in D.C. rose to 102 degrees on Saturday, breaking a Fourth of July record of 100 degrees set in 1919, according to NBC Washington. 
According to the WUSA article, event organizers said the National Mall would reopen at 9:45 p.m. 
“The Salute to America celebration will proceed, with President Donald Trump scheduled to deliver remarks at 11 p.m., followed by a fireworks display,” the report stated. 
Indeed, Fox News’s Bret Baier said President Trump called him to say he was going to deliver his speech “no matter what” because America's veterans went through “bad weather” on D-Day during World War II and he was not going to let bad weather stop him, either: 
In another show of American spirit, a large crowd of people sheltering from the incoming weather inside the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (USDA) building began singing the National Anthem: 
In light of the update for the event's reopening, Freedom 250 spokesperson Danielle Alvarez said, “America, it's time to celebrate.” 
“Rain or shine, the American people deserve a celebration worthy of our nation's historic 250th birthday. 
For 250 years, Americans have overcome every challenge with grit, resilience, and determination. 
A little rain will never diminish our pride, our patriotism, or our celebration of the greatest nation in the history of the world,” she stated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 3.7%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Amy Furr: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias5.7%This article: 14.4%Amy Furr: 7.9%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic14.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.5%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 36.8%Amy Furr: 7.4%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect36.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.2%Amy Furr: 1.2%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 21.6%Amy Furr: 5.4%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias21.6%This article: 5.3%Amy Furr: 1.6%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 6.1%Amy Furr: 11.1%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 2.9%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Amy Furr: 10.2%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Amy Furr: 2.7%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Amy Furr: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.5%Amy Furr: 8.2%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority24.5%This article: 3.4%Amy Furr: 4.4%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Amy Furr: 8.6%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.0%Amy Furr: 10.4%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion4.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.9%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.9%Amy Furr: 7.4%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.6%Amy Furr: 3.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal21.6%This article: 5.3%Amy Furr: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman5.3%This article: 5.7%Amy Furr: 1.7%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.4%Amy Furr: 6.7%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote30.4%This article: 3.8%Amy Furr: 4.7%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 34.9%Amy Furr: 7.0%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice34.9%This article: 18.2%Amy Furr: 6.3%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination18.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 13.1%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Furr: 1.1%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

473 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers70%attributed speech143writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageSalem News Channel • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWUSA 9 • 35 words • 100.0% coverageBreitbart News • 27 words • 100.0% coverageFreedom 250 • 26 words • 100.0% coverageFreedom 250 • 41 words • 100.0% coverageFreedom 250 • 25 words • 100.0% coverageNBC Washington • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageBret Baier • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDanielle Alvarez • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDanielle Alvarez • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDanielle Alvarez • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDanielle Alvarez • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bret Baier

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words14% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+36.4 ptsWriter: 63.6%Bret Baier: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-29.4 ptsWriter: 29.4%Bret Baier: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.6 ptsWriter: 12.6%Bret Baier: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.