75% of all PS3 games reportedly now run on PC via open-source emulator RPCS3 — announcement comes weeks after Sony's plan to shutter the PlayStation Store for PS3 and PS Vita by 2027 ⁠76%

By Jowi Morales⁠76%

7/16/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 572 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,279 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the article peer group.

RPCS3, a multi-platform open-source PlayStation 3 emulator and debugger, has revealed that 2,681 of the total 3,559 PS3 titles are now compatible with its software, meaning a huge majority of games can now be played on Windows, Linux, macOS, and FreeBSD. 
The developers of the app said on X that RPCS3 is continually being worked on and that they’re targeting full preservation of the entire PS3 library. 
This is an important development for PlayStation 3 owners and enthusiasts, especially as Sony said that it will stop making physical game discs by 2028 and shut down the PlayStation Store for PS3 and PS Vita a year before that. 
75% of all PlayStation 3 games are now PLAYABLE on PC! 
RPCS3 continues to be improved with new features, fixes, and optimisations, bringing it ever closer to preserving the entire PS3 library. pic.twitter.com/7HtrgPBwGc July 14, 2026 
Ensuring that over 2,600 games are compatible with your emulation is no mean feat, especially for a project that’s mostly supported by Patreon and volunteers. 
The team has already achieved more than 75% compatibility with the entire PS3 library, with less than a thousand titles needing to be worked on. 
Of this, 816 are now playable but encounter serious glitches or performance problems, 60 reach the game’s main menu but fail to load past that, while only two titles initialize but are stuck on a black screen. 
If you want to check if you can now play your favorite PS3 title on your PC, you can go to the RPCS3 compatibility page and type in the name of the game. 
This is a huge win for the game preservation community, as this would ensure that you can continue playing your PS3 game library even if your console no longer works. 
The beautiful thing about RPCS3 is that it works with a lot of different hardware — aside from support for Windows, Linux, macOS, and FreeBSD, it’s also compatible with both x86 and arm64, so you can install it on some of the best handheld gaming PCs to play your PS3 games on the go. 
Emulation is quite controversial among game publishers and developers, and many companies have historically taken steps against those who make these apps. 
However, the courts have said that emulation isn’t necessarily illegal, as long as the people who use them only play games that they’ve already paid for. 
In fact, the Patreon page of RPCS3 was once hit by a DMCA takedown request from Atlus, the maker of Persona 5, arguing that “no version of the P5 game should be playable on this platform; and [the RPCS3] developers are infringing on our IP by making such games playable.” 
While it ultimately failed in its request, it showed how some companies think that their games should only be played on the platform that they designed it for. 
They argue that emulators might introduce performance issues, meaning players will not get the optimal experience when playing their games. 
However, RPCS3 has proven that emulators could deliver a similar (or even better) performance than the PS3, with newer versions getting a 5% to 7% boost in FPS numbers compared to previous builds and even hitting more than 1500 FPS on the Minecraft title screen . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.6%Jowi Morales: 4.5%Tom's Hardware: 3.8%Confirmation Bias12.6%This article: 4.4%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 2.3%Anchoring Bias4.4%This article: 8.0%Jowi Morales: 4.9%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.7%Tom's Hardware: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Jowi Morales: 3.4%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Overconfidence Bias8.0%This article: 7.7%Jowi Morales: 12.9%Tom's Hardware: 9.2%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 12.8%Jowi Morales: 2.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Loss Aversion12.8%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 37.1%Jowi Morales: 6.9%Tom's Hardware: 6.0%Optimism Bias37.1%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.0%Jowi Morales: 13.7%Tom's Hardware: 6.5%Negativity Bias21.0%This article: 4.4%Jowi Morales: 1.3%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Jowi Morales: 1.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 4.9%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.9%This article: 21.9%Jowi Morales: 2.6%Tom's Hardware: 2.8%Halo Effect21.9%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.1%Jowi Morales: 1.7%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Recency Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.6%Jowi Morales: 6.7%Tom's Hardware: 5.4%Appeal to Authority12.6%This article: 7.0%Jowi Morales: 4.0%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.4%Tom's Hardware: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.2%Jowi Morales: 8.8%Tom's Hardware: 6.1%Hasty Generalization18.2%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.9%Jowi Morales: 1.2%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Bandwagon1.9%This article: 26.0%Jowi Morales: 7.1%Tom's Hardware: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion26.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.8%Jowi Morales: 6.3%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.8%Jowi Morales: 1.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Burden of Proof5.8%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.0%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Composition/Division8.0%This article: 12.9%Jowi Morales: 3.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.6%Anecdotal12.9%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.5%Jowi Morales: 3.5%Tom's Hardware: 3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.5%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.3%Jowi Morales: 3.3%Tom's Hardware: 2.4%Unattributed Quote13.3%This article: 1.9%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 24.1%Jowi Morales: 8.9%Tom's Hardware: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice24.1%This article: 5.8%Jowi Morales: 2.2%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Jowi Morales: 6.8%Tom's Hardware: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.8%

572 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech481writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageRPCS3 • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAtlus • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

RPCS3

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words45% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.7 ptsWriter: 28.7%RPCS3: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%RPCS3: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%RPCS3: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%RPCS3: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%RPCS3: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.