Gizmodo57%

The Memory Shortage Is So Bad That Smartphone Shipments Hit a Record Low 71%

By Ece Yildirim73%

7/13/2026, 2:47:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 536 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,426 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the article peer group.

Global smartphone shipments fell 11% in the second quarter of this year, marking the lowest level since 2013, according to estimates from Counterpoint Research. 
To blame are soaring smartphone prices, driven incrementally higher as a global memory chip shortage worsens. 
“The global memory crisis has now overtaken every other factor as the single biggest drag on the smartphone industry,” Counterpoint Research senior analyst Shilpi Jain said in the release. 
The AI boom and the unprecedented data center buildout have skyrocketed demand for high-bandwidth memory chips. 
With the trillions of dollars flowing into scaling AI globally, the top chipmakers have shifted their focus almost entirely to address the AI industry’s chip demand, albeit at the expense of consumer electronics manufacturers. 
With finite chipmaking capacity, consumer-level memory supply has dragged, causing delays and price hikes that have been undeniably passed on to consumers looking to buy gadgets that also rely on these memory chips, such as computers and smartphones. 
But the impact is not dealt equally. 
Demand for smartphones from Samsung and Apple in the second quarter was still pretty resilient, Counterpoint claims, with both phonemakers experiencing growth. 
Driven by the flagship Galaxy S26 series and fewer price hikes than some competitors, Samsung experienced the strongest growth in shipments. 
Meanwhile, Apple’s market share rose to a record 20%, probably thanks to its position as the only major smartphone manufacturer that has largely avoided price hikes. 
But that reality is looking likely to change with the upcoming iPhone 18, which recent reports claim could be priced at least $200 higher than the iPhone 17 Pro. 
Apple CEO Tim Cook also told the Wall Street Journal last month that the memory chip shortage had become “unsustainable,” making price hikes for Apple products simply “unavoidable.” 
“This is a hundred-year flood,” Cook told the WSJ. 
“I’ve never seen anything like it in any area in over 40 years.” 
Instead of Samsung and Apple, the brunt of the decline in shipments was faced by smartphone makers that appeal to a more budget-conscious consumer, such as China’s Xiaomi and Oppo. 
Entry and mid-tier smartphones, which are priced considerably lower than the iPhone, experienced major price hikes because production became “structurally unfeasible at previous price points,” Jain said. 
Analysts foresee the memory crisis continuing into next year and beyond, with some experts even seeing the shortage and the accompanying price hikes bleeding into the next decade. 
Top memory chipmaker SK Hynix’s CEO Kwak Noh-Jung told Reuters last week that he expects 2027 to be the worst year yet for the memory shortage. 
“We forecast that next year will be the worst year in the industry’s history from the supply perspective,” Kwak told Reuters. 
“We still forecast that customer demand will remain higher than our supply capacity even beyond 2030.” 
The Counterpoint report’s view is also pessimistic. 
As the shortage continues into next year, the researchers expect shipments to be down around 14% for the full year 2026. 
“Overall demand recovery is unlikely until memory supply conditions improve substantially,” the company said. 
If AI hype and soaring financial commitments continue as is, that improvement in conditions is unlikely to happen any time soon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Ece Yildirim: 4.6%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Ece Yildirim: 4.1%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 4.9%Ece Yildirim: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.7%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Ece Yildirim: 8.9%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 4.8%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Ece Yildirim: 6.4%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias27.4%This article: 21.8%Ece Yildirim: 10.0%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias21.8%This article: 4.9%Ece Yildirim: 2.9%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 9.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error9.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.6%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Ece Yildirim: 3.4%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 35.3%Ece Yildirim: 8.5%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority35.3%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.9%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope3.9%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.9%Ece Yildirim: 7.4%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization14.9%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.9%Ece Yildirim: 4.0%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion6.9%This article: 7.8%Ece Yildirim: 2.2%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question7.8%This article: 34.1%Ece Yildirim: 7.0%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)34.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.6%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.4%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Ece Yildirim: 2.8%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.4%Ece Yildirim: 4.9%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice13.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.7%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

536 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers32%attributed speech367writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageShilpi Jain • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTim Cook • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTim Cook • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTim Cook • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJain • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageKwak Noh-Jung • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKwak Noh-Jung • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKwak Noh-Jung • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tim Cook

100%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words30% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+26.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tim Cook: 26.0%26.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.6 ptsWriter: 19.6%Tim Cook: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.