CBC49%

Meet Aleksei, the contortionist whose flexibility is too intense for some to watch 33%

By Nina Dragicevic0%

3/19/2026, 6:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 817 faulty-reasoning hits from 792 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,789 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

“Aleksei, plus one.” 
“Aleksei, plus one again.” 
“Plus one, Aleksei.” 
Contortionist Aleksei Goloborodko, a performer in Cirque du Soleil’s hit show LUZIA, was growing confused. 
His artistic director, and others in the show, kept saying the phrase to him. 
“At that time, my English was not that good yet, and I didn’t know what exactly he meant,” Goloborodko said. 
“I thought it was some kind of a phrase, like ‘break a leg,’ like ‘good luck,’ but why would he say such a thing after the performance?” 
Finally Goloborodko braced himself and asked: what does “plus one” mean? 
It turns out they were keeping count of how many times an audience member would faint during his contortionist act. 
As Goloborodko shares in the new CBC series Cirque Life, his count is up to 74. 
At the time of this interview in early March, he’s up to 78. 
Goloborodko thought it was a joke at first. 
But then the PR manager, ushers, and stage staff all confirmed  people were fainting during his performance and they had to be taken care of onsite. 
Europe was particularly sensitive, Goloborodko added. 
“In Spain, it’s happened a lot, almost every single week. 
Sometimes twice a week,” he said. 
“They had to stop the show because someone didn’t feel good. 
And the guys working after me, which is swing to swing, they came up to me and they were like, ‘Aleksei, could you stop, please? 
It distracts from our work.’ 
But I was like, ‘It’s not my fault. 
It’s just happening.’” 
A mainstay of circus acts, contortionism originated in China and Mongolia and has inspired, shocked and unsettled audiences for centuries. 
Like many acts, exceptional beauty and achievement flirted with the impossible, even danger. 
For Goloborodko, the art form of unfathomable flexibility was lifelong work  no mere hobby, but a full lifestyle that required total dedication. 
At age 4, in Tula, Russia, Goloborodko saw a commercial for the circus and begged his parents to see the show. 
After the show, he begged to join  in any discipline, he added. 
“I asked my parents to take me to a circus studio because I wanted to be part of this world, but it didn’t matter at the time what discipline I would do,” Goloborodko said. 
“I just wanted to be in this bright, colourful, noisy environment.” 
A coach at the circus studio felt that the young Goloborodko was flexible enough to try contortion. 
But the safe practice of contortionism required hours of training every day, and two training sessions per day in his teen years, he said. 
It required his full dedication, even as he kept up with school, homework and exams. 
But Goloborodko loved it. 
As he reminisced recently, if he ever misbehaved as a child, his mother would threaten to keep him home from the circus studio. 
He developed additional skills in sport, dance, martial arts and gymnastics to hone his performance. 
Goloborodko didn’t want to just perform a series of tricks, one after the other: “The idea was to make it look like a dance, like one sequence of the whole act.” 
Asked about his impressive work ethic and discipline from such a young age, he deflects. 
Goloborodko prefers to credit all the people who trained and supported him: parents, coaches, teachers and trainers. 
“I work hard, yes,” he said. 
“I worked hard, but sometimes when a person wants to do something, and this person works really hard, but the environment is not supportive  sometimes things don’t happen.” 
“I would say that my whole environment supported me.” 
Today, Goloborodko is frequently called the world’s most flexible man. 
As the first episode of Cirque Life shows, he is still ambitious  setting a Guiness World Record for “Most prone extreme back bends in one minute (male).” 
Although he aimed for 12 back bends, he completed 14 in that time. 
The total dedication to the craft remains. 
LUZIA can have up to 10 or 11 shows per week, which can mean several shows in one day, for which Goloborodko takes 45 minutes to warm up each time. 
He never skips a warmup. 
If he has time or fewer performances one day, he will do additional strength training and other exercises  he also enjoys jogging  but nothing interferes with the show. 
“Of course the main focus, the main goal, is the show, and this is the priority,” Goloborodko said. 
“The show is always the priority. 
If I feel like I have lack of energy, I don’t have strength, I need to rest more  I postpone all my trainings and just focus on performing.” 
Watch Cirque Life, now streaming on CBC Gem. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.4%Nina Dragicevic: 1.1%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias3.4%This article: 3.4%Nina Dragicevic: 1.4%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.4%This article: 5.9%Nina Dragicevic: 3.1%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.7%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Nina Dragicevic: 0.1%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.6%This article: 1.6%Nina Dragicevic: 1.2%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Nina Dragicevic: 0.4%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Nina Dragicevic: 3.4%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.6%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Nina Dragicevic: 10.5%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias3.5%This article: 4.3%Nina Dragicevic: 1.0%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 3.7%Nina Dragicevic: 1.0%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.4%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 1.1%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Nina Dragicevic: 3.1%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Nina Dragicevic: 0.4%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.4%Nina Dragicevic: 1.8%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority10.4%This article: 6.6%Nina Dragicevic: 0.8%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.8%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Nina Dragicevic: 2.5%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.4%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.4%Nina Dragicevic: 2.5%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion1.4%This article: 2.3%Nina Dragicevic: 0.3%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 3.9%Nina Dragicevic: 3.5%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.4%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.8%Nina Dragicevic: 0.1%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.8%This article: 8.2%Nina Dragicevic: 2.6%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.5%Nina Dragicevic: 1.8%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.2%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.3%Nina Dragicevic: 0.5%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 1.9%Nina Dragicevic: 2.5%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice1.9%This article: 2.3%Nina Dragicevic: 2.6%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination2.3%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 1.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Nina Dragicevic: 0.9%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

792 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers44%attributed speech442writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 34 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 29 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 18 words • 100.0% coverageGoloborodko • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGoloborodko • 29 words • 0.0% coverageCBC Gem • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Goloborodko

63%flagged-word coverage
342 attributed words98% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination+5.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Goloborodko: 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer Voice-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Goloborodko: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Goloborodko: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.