BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 646 faulty-reasoning hits from 747 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,322 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the article peer group.

Crime in Memphis has continued its precipitous decrease through the first half of the year, data from the Memphis-Shelby County Crime Commission indicates. 
Compared to the same time frame in 2025, Memphis' overall crime has dropped 23.8%, while the murder rate has dropped 41.1%. 
However, simple assaults and drug violations have increased. 
Overall crime in the city has reached its lowest point since 2020 and is far lower than it was in 2011, according to the Crime Commission's data. 
The trend has been part of a three-year decrease in crime that began after it peaked in 2023. 
The Crime Commission uses preliminary data from the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and releases quarterly crime reports, which date back to 2011. 
Both crime rates from 2025 and 2026 show improvements, which have not been seen in the last 25 years. 
Current reports also show a decrease in property crime. 
A look at the stats 
The Memphis Police Department sends its own incidents to TBI for data collection. 
The overall crime statistic, which has dropped 23.8%, includes all Group A offenses, which are the major crimes tracked by TBI. 
The Crime Commission also breaks its crime statistics into two specific categories: major violent crime and major property crime. 
The major violent crime group include all reported murders, rapes, aggravated assaults and robberies. 
The major property crime includes reported burglaries, thefts and motor vehicle thefts. 
Every category of reported major violent and property crime has seen marked declines compared to 2025: 
* The reported murder rate was 11.8 murders per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 72) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 20 murders per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 122) in 2025, a 41.1% decrease. 
* The reported rape rate was 20.6 per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 126) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 31.2 rapes per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 190) in 2025, a 33.8% decrease. 
* The reported aggravated assault rate was 635 aggravated assaults per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 3,877) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 898.2 aggravated assaults per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 5,476) in 2025, a 29.3% decrease. 
* The reported robbery rate was 78.9 robberies per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 482) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 139.9 robberies per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 853) in 2025, a 43.6% decrease. 
* The reported burglary rate was 251.9 burglaries per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 1,538) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 351.8 burglaries per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 2,145) in 2025, a 28.4% decrease. 
* The reported theft rate was 1,220.4 thefts per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 7,451) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 1,931.3 thefts per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 11,774) in 2025, a 36.8% decrease. 
* The reported motor vehicle theft rate was 230.5 motor vehicle thefts per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 1,407) through the first half of 2026. 
It fell from 583.8 motor vehicle thefts per 100,000 Memphians (a total of 3,559) in 2025, a 60.5% decrease. 
Despite large improvements in crime categories compared to last year, simple assaults and drug violations are up a respective 4.3% and 19.6% compared to last year. 
Still, the total Group A offenses reported through the first six months of the year are far fewer than in years past. 
There has been a 23.8% decrease in total crime compared to the first half of 2025 and a 41% decrease compared to the first half of 2023, when Memphis crime peaked and reached near-record highs. 
This year's crime rate sets Memphis on the path to having its lowest crime rate in 26 years, for the second year in a row. 
TBI started publishing annual crime statistics for all law enforcement departments in Tennessee in 2010. 
Since that year, Memphis' lowest Group A crime rate was 14,625.6 offenses per 100,000 residents in 2025, according to early numbers from the Crime Commission. 
Official crime statistics from 2025 have not yet been published by the TBI. 
However, official TBI numbers show the next-lowest overall crime rate for Memphis was in 2015 when the city reported 14,843 crimes per 100,000 residents. 
Lucas Finton covers crime, policing, jails, the courts and criminal justice policy for The Commercial Appeal. 
He can be reached by phone or email: (901)208-3922 and Lucas.Finton@commercialappeal.com, and followed on X @LucasFinton. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.2%Lucas Finton: 2.4%The Commercial Appeal: 1.9%Confirmation Bias7.2%This article: 17.0%Lucas Finton: 8.4%The Commercial Appeal: 5.8%Anchoring Bias17.0%This article: 8.3%Lucas Finton: 2.8%The Commercial Appeal: 4.0%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.4%Lucas Finton: 0.8%The Commercial Appeal: 0.6%Hindsight Bias2.4%This article: 3.3%Lucas Finton: 1.1%The Commercial Appeal: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 5.6%Lucas Finton: 4.6%The Commercial Appeal: 3.5%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Lucas Finton: 7.3%The Commercial Appeal: 5.0%Optimism Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Lucas Finton: 1.5%The Commercial Appeal: 2.3%Negativity Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Lucas Finton: 0.7%The Commercial Appeal: 0.5%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.2%Lucas Finton: 0.4%The Commercial Appeal: 1.1%Recency Bias1.2%This article: 3.3%Lucas Finton: 1.1%The Commercial Appeal: 0.8%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.3%Lucas Finton: 2.0%The Commercial Appeal: 1.4%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.7%Lucas Finton: 1.6%The Commercial Appeal: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.7%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.3%Lucas Finton: 1.7%The Commercial Appeal: 1.2%Burden of Proof3.3%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Lucas Finton: 4.2%The Commercial Appeal: 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Lucas Finton: 1.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.7%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.1%Lucas Finton: 2.1%The Commercial Appeal: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice3.1%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Finton: 0.0%The Commercial Appeal: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

747 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.7%attributed speech734writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMemphis Police Department • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words100% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Memphis Police Department: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Memphis Police Department: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.