BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 233 faulty-reasoning hits from 139 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (19,775 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the article peer group.

Expect road work and lane restrictions on the Clay Wade Bailey Bridge during the Thursday morning commute. 
Northbound traffic on the Clay Wade Bailey Bridge will be shifted to the middle lane for crews to work on the right lane of the bridge Starting at 8 a.m. 
Aug. 6, said a news release from the Ohio Department of Transportation. 
The restrictions will end around noon. 
Crews from the department's Hamilton County maintenance facility and bridge department will conduct routine inspections on the side of the bridge that enters Ohio. 
The release asks drivers to remain alert, reduce their speed, and watch for stopped traffic while passing through the work zone to ensure the safety of the workers and other travelers. 
Road work will be dependent on the weather. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.5%The Enquirer: 1.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 21.6%Gillian Stawiszynski: 6.3%The Enquirer: 1.4%Anchoring Bias21.6%This article: 5.8%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.8%The Enquirer: 1.7%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.1%The Enquirer: 1.7%Framing Effect7.9%This article: 22.3%Gillian Stawiszynski: 3.2%The Enquirer: 0.4%Loss Aversion22.3%This article: 5.8%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.8%The Enquirer: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.6%The Enquirer: 1.4%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.6%The Enquirer: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.2%Gillian Stawiszynski: 7.1%The Enquirer: 4.0%Negativity Bias30.2%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.3%Gillian Stawiszynski: 4.9%The Enquirer: 1.7%Appeal to Authority22.3%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.9%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.1%The Enquirer: 1.8%Appeal to Emotion7.9%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.2%The Enquirer: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.6%Gillian Stawiszynski: 3.0%The Enquirer: 1.0%Unattributed Quote8.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 22.3%Gillian Stawiszynski: 9.5%The Enquirer: 0.8%Indoctrination22.3%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

139 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker22%attributed speech108writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words100% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ohio Department of Transportation: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Ohio Department of Transportation: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.