BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 97 faulty-reasoning hits from 106 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,840 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the article peer group.

All lanes are closed on Interstate 75 South at Ohio 73/West Central Avenue in Warren County due to a crash on Tuesday, Aug. 4 morning, according to the Ohio Department of Transportation. 
People were taken to the hospital from the crash site, according to the Ohio State Highway Patrol. 
No information on how many people were injured was available. 
Several ramps on I-75 South are closed near the crash. 
The ramp from Ohio 73, from I-675 South, and to and from Austin Boulevard are all closed. 
No reopening time has been provided. 
This report may be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.5%The Enquirer: 1.5%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 30.2%Gillian Stawiszynski: 6.3%The Enquirer: 1.4%Anchoring Bias30.2%This article: 9.4%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.8%The Enquirer: 1.7%Availability Heuristic9.4%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.1%The Enquirer: 1.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 3.2%The Enquirer: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.4%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.8%The Enquirer: 0.6%Status Quo Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.6%The Enquirer: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.6%The Enquirer: 0.4%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 7.1%The Enquirer: 4.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 4.9%The Enquirer: 1.7%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.1%The Enquirer: 1.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 1.2%The Enquirer: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 3.0%The Enquirer: 1.0%Unattributed Quote16.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 9.5%The Enquirer: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian Stawiszynski: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

106 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers46%attributed speech57writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words35% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ohio State Highway Patrol: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.