As Washington state's flood recovery unfolds, what resources can people expect?70%

By Kim Malcolm39% Monica Nickelsburg0%

12/20/2025, 1:07:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 268 faulty-reasoning hits from 509 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.1% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,587 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the article peer group.

We don't have numbers yet on how many Washington homes and businesses have experienced flooding. 
Emergency officials say it's too early to even guess until flood waters recede. 
But for people starting to clean up, the safety issues are serious. 
Flood waters can bring sewage and bacteria, which cause mold and other hazards. 
To find out more about what's ahead in the recovery process, Kim Malcolm talked to KUOW’s Monica Nickelsburg, who has been reporting on what assistance will be available to Western Washingtonians as they recover. 
This interview has been edited for clarity. 
Kim Malcolm: We've heard directly from several families impacted by recent flooding, but thousands more around the state are either still out of their homes or in flood recovery mode. 
Can affected property owners expect to get help from insurance? 
Monica Nickelsburg: Unfortunately, most typical homeowners and renters insurance policies don't cover this type of flooding. 
Usually, to get help with those repairs you would need to have a separate flood insurance policy. 
And do we know how many properties in Washington are covered by flood insurance? 
It's about 50,000 homes and businesses in Washington that have flood insurance between the program that FEMA administers and the private market. 
That's about half the number of people who were advised to evacuate at the height of the flooding. 
It doesn't mean all of those homes were damaged, but we just don't know at this point. 
In general, experts say that a lot more people should have flood insurance than do. 
Is there clarity on what resources are available to property owners who don't have flood insurance? 
It's a little bit of a wait and see. 
It really depends whether President Trump signs off on a federal disaster declaration and at the same time authorizes FEMA to provide individual assistance to households. 
That would be different than the federal emergency that's already been declared, which is really more about providing lifesaving first responder emergency relief from FEMA. 
Right now, the counties that have a lot of flooding are running surveys to assess the damage. 
Governor Ferguson will use the data collected in those surveys to make his case for a federal disaster declaration. 
So, if you're a property owner who has damage, you should go to your county website and fill out this survey. 
How about any resources available at the local level? 
Damaged properties might also be able to get relief from state and local property taxes. 
County websites have details on that. 
And even though homeowners insurance doesn't typically cover flood damage, your auto insurance might. 
If your car was damaged, you should check your policy. 
What do officials recommend you do to document the damage to your home or business? 
They're recommending taking lots of photos and videos, and keeping all of the receipts that you get for repairs and cleanup you hire out. 
The county surveys have detailed lists of everything that should be documented with photos and videos to support the claims. 
Listen to the interview by clicking the play button above. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 3.3%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Kim Malcolm: 4.4%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 3.5%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 11.6%Kim Malcolm: 5.4%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias11.6%This article: 5.7%Kim Malcolm: 5.2%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.3%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.1%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.7%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Kim Malcolm: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 2.4%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 5.9%Kim Malcolm: 4.2%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 9.6%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 3.7%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.9%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 4.1%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 2.3%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.5%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kim Malcolm: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

509 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.