Daily Kos84%

Here’s another sign that Democrats are building a blue wave - Daily Kos 77%

By Emily Singer83%

7/8/2026, 4:01:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 72.6% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 1,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 572 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.4% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,146 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the article peer group.

Here’s another sign that Democrats are building a blue wave 
July 8, 2026 at 4:01 PM 
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook 
Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky 
Share on X (Opens in new window) X 
Share using Native tools Share Copied to clipboard 
Primary voters line up to cast ballots at a voting center in Dallas on March 3. 
AP 
Historic trends and current polling have shown that November’s midterm elections are very likely to be a blue wave , with Democrats favored to win control of the U.S. 
House, flip multiple gubernatorial mansions and state legislatures , and possibly even take back the Senate . 
But there’s yet another bit of evidence that points to Democrats having a blockbuster election cycle: party registration trends. 
For the third month in a row, Democrats gained more new voter registrants than Republicans, according to pollster John Couvillon, who has been tracking party registration data for years. 
Couvillon found that Democrats added 83,000 new registrants in June, while Republicans added 64,000. 
Democrats out-registering Republicans reverses what had been a bad trend for the party , as the Democratic Party had seen membership dwindle since 2020. 
In fact, the Democratic voter registration slide was one of the early signs that the 2024 election was not going to go Democrats’ way. 
That year, according to Gallup, more people identified with Republicans than Democrats. 
Related | Republicans can’t gerrymander their way out of this midterm environment 
But now that trend is flipping. 
Even more promising for Democrats is that new Democratic registrants are popping up in places that have competitive statewide contests. 
For example in Nevada —where Democrats are trying to win back the governor’s mansion this fall—Democrats added 5,020 new voters in June while Republicans added 1,820. 
In Iowa —where Democrats are looking to flip the governor’s mansion , a U.S. 
Senate seat, and as many as three U.S. 
House districts —Democrats added 25,245 new registrants in June while Republicans added 14,781. 
Jack Ohman/Tribune Content Agency 
And in Nebraska —home to a sleeper Senate race and multiple competitive House contests—Democrats gained 559 voters in June while Republicans lost 126 registrants. 
New registrations aren’t the only good bit of news for Democrats, either. 
In the primary contests that have taken place so far, Democratic primaries saw larger turnout than Republican contests by a wide margin. 
“This is perhaps the best sign for Democrats so far: they’re dominating primary turnout,” CNN analyst Harry Enten said on Tuesday, noting that Democratic primaries accounted for 57% of all ballots cast this cycle. 
Enten added that this is a massive swing from 2022, when Democrats cast just 47% of the votes. 
“In every midterm since at least 2006, the party with higher primary turnout won the House,” Enten said. 
Of course, individual races may be challenging at the moment ::cough:: Maine’s Senate race ::cough:: 
But overall, the stars seem to be aligning for a Democratic wave. 
Let’s keep our foot on the gas. 
We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough. 
We continue to be paywall-free. 
We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. 
But we need to bring in more revenue. 
We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet. 
#BlueWave #DemocraticParty #GOP #VoterRegistration 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.7%Emily Singer: 6.2%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.9%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Emily Singer: 4.2%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic13.1%This article: 7.7%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic7.7%This article: 8.4%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.6%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Emily Singer: 9.6%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Emily Singer: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.6%This article: 21.7%Emily Singer: 2.1%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias21.7%This article: 2.6%Emily Singer: 3.0%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 19.0%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 1.0%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 4.2%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Emily Singer: 2.3%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.3%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.9%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.1%Emily Singer: 2.4%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias12.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 8.4%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.7%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.2%Emily Singer: 3.6%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority18.2%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 1.9%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 2.0%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 22.6%Emily Singer: 10.1%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization22.6%This article: 3.3%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring3.3%This article: 4.0%Emily Singer: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 10.0%Emily Singer: 7.9%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.4%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.6%Emily Singer: 6.1%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.6%This article: 2.1%Emily Singer: 1.7%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque2.1%This article: 1.4%Emily Singer: 1.2%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 1.4%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.0%Emily Singer: 1.8%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.6%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading2.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Emily Singer: 2.8%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 5.9%Emily Singer: 2.2%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.9%This article: 22.4%Emily Singer: 27.4%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice22.4%This article: 1.9%Emily Singer: 1.5%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination1.9%This article: 72.6%Emily Singer: 14.6%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias72.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Singer: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Emily Singer: 2.7%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.6%

572 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech488writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Couvillon • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageHarry Enten • 34 words • 100.0% coverageHarry Enten • 18 words • 100.0% coverageHarry Enten • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Harry Enten

100%flagged-word coverage
70 attributed words83% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Politically Left Leaning B-0.1 ptsWriter: 74.4%Harry Enten: 74.3%74.3%Unattributed Quote+48.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Harry Enten: 48.6%48.6%Quote-first Misdirection+48.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Harry Enten: 48.6%48.6%Biased Writer Voice-26.2 ptsWriter: 26.2%Harry Enten: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.2 ptsWriter: 18.2%Harry Enten: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Harry Enten: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.