Daily Kos84%

GOP shoots itself in the foot, and Trump takes sex ed to a new level of creepy 96%

By Daily Kos Staff96%

7/24/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 87.1% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 698 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,051 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the article peer group.

Trump’s version of sex ed: More teen pregnancies, please. 
The administration is fixated on white people having as many babies as possible—even if they’re teenagers. 
Oil prices skyrocket as Trump’s lies stack up 
Good thing there aren’t important elections coming up or anything  
Thousands desperately turn to sex work after DOGE killed USAID 
“The Trump administration’s executive order will cause people to die.” 
Say ‘cheese!’ 
The Four Horsemen of the Trumpocalypse. 
House GOP votes for its own electoral doom 
More money for war—none for food, healthcare, housing, etc. 
Another worst week for Bari Weiss 
At least she’s consistent? 
🤷‍♀️ 
Trump voter’s family wants nothing to do with him. 
Good for them. 
Poor wittle guy is sad his family figured out he’s an asshole. 
Click here to see more cartoons. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%Daily Kos Staff: 5.1%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Daily Kos Staff: 3.4%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.3%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.3%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.1%Daily Kos Staff: 20.8%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect23.1%This article: 6.1%Daily Kos Staff: 2.5%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 1.1%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Daily Kos Staff: 3.8%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias11.6%This article: 87.1%Daily Kos Staff: 36.1%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias87.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.5%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%Daily Kos Staff: 3.5%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error17.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 3.9%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Daily Kos Staff: 2.2%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 2.9%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Daily Kos Staff: 1.1%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.7%Daily Kos Staff: 16.4%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem19.7%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 2.1%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.5%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 13.6%Daily Kos Staff: 3.1%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma13.6%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.7%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 18.4%Daily Kos Staff: 15.1%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization18.4%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 1.8%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.9%Daily Kos Staff: 19.3%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion27.9%This article: 10.9%Daily Kos Staff: 4.4%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question10.9%This article: 12.2%Daily Kos Staff: 2.8%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.2%This article: 8.2%Daily Kos Staff: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque8.2%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 1.1%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Daily Kos Staff: 1.7%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Daily Kos Staff: 3.0%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.7%Daily Kos Staff: 3.3%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote19.7%This article: 6.8%Daily Kos Staff: 2.7%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 87.1%Daily Kos Staff: 49.7%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice87.1%This article: 10.9%Daily Kos Staff: 5.5%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination10.9%This article: 41.5%Daily Kos Staff: 32.3%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias41.5%This article: 0.0%Daily Kos Staff: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Daily Kos Staff: 11.5%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

147 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.