Daily Kos84%

Trump crowned himself the crypto president. Then crypto collapsed. 24%

By kos74%

6/30/2026, 4:01:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 600 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.4% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,836 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the article peer group.

When Donald Trump returned to the White House, one industry was convinced it had finally elected its champion: crypto. 
Trump didn’t just promise lighter regulation on cryptocurrency. 
He declared himself America’s “crypto president.” 
He vowed to make the United States the crypto capital of the world. 
He appointed a White House crypto czar, David Sacks. 
He hosted crypto executives at an unprecedented White House summit. 
His administration rolled back enforcement actions, embraced digital assets, and even proposed a “strategic bitcoin reserve.” 
The crypto world responded with jubilation. 
Investors believed their moment had finally arrived. 
Industry executives praised Trump as a visionary. 
Investors poured money into bitcoin, Ethereum, meme coins, and every crypto-related investment they could find. 
If anyone was going to usher in a new golden age for digital assets, surely it would be the self-proclaimed crypto president. 
After Trump’s 2024 victory, bitcoin skyrocketed from roughly $69,000 on Election Day to more than $103,000 on the day of his inauguration, in January 2025. 
By that October, bitcoin closed an all-time high of nearly $126,000. 
The crypto bros were euphoric. 
Then reality intruded. 
Now, while artificial intelligence booms on Wall Street, crypto has been pummeled. 
On Tuesday morning, Bitcoin was trading at around $58,000, below where it stood before Trump was elected. 
Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, has fallen nearly 70% from its 2025 high. 
As of this past Thursday, more than $2 trillion in value had vanished from the crypto market since its October 2025 peak. 
No investment better captures Trump’s presidency than his own meme coin. 
It debuted around $45 and now trades for under $2. 
First lady Melania Trump’s shitcoin is down over 98%. 
The people who bought into the hype got wiped out. 
The insiders who created it had every opportunity to cash out near the top. 
It is, in miniature, the story of Trump’s entire crypto presidency. 
But the biggest gap hasn’t been between Trump’s promises and crypto’s performance. 
It has been between who made money. 
Trump gave the crypto industry much of what it had demanded from Washington. 
Friendly regulators. 
A friendly White House. 
Explicit government backing. 
Direct access to the president. 
A proposed strategic reserve. 
The kind of legitimacy the industry had spent more than a decade chasing. 
It just didn’t make them rich. 
Ironically, the person who appears to have profited most from Trump’s crypto presidency wasn’t the average crypto investor. 
It was Donald Trump. 
Trump and his family didn’t just buy crypto. 
They’ve built a sprawling crypto empire—launching meme coins, investing in crypto firms, issuing a stablecoin (USD1), and expanding into bitcoin mining. 
That has created an extraordinary conflict of interest. 
Every time Trump proclaimed himself the “crypto president,” every time he welcomed crypto executives to the White House, every time his administration announced another crypto-friendly policy, Trump and his family stood to benefit financially. 
Here’s what that looked like in practice. 
As crypto prices sank and investors watched their portfolios shrink, a Trump-tied crypto company reportedly kept selling hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of its own crypto tokens. 
The buyers took the risk. 
Trump’s family appears to have collected the money. 
The same pattern has showed up elsewhere. 
Eric Trump’s American Bitcoin, a crypto mining firm, reportedly lost more than 90% of its value from its post-IPO high, eliminating more than $200 million for outside investors. 
But Eric Trump, who received his founder’s stake on different terms than ordinary investors, still held shares reportedly worth around $70 million. 
Crypto investors are learning the same lesson as everyone else who has ever mistaken Donald Trump for an ally. 
They didn’t think they had helped to elect a president who would merely tolerate crypto. 
Many in the crypto world have an almost evangelical belief that blockchain will revolutionize finance and reshape society. 
And they believed Trump shared that faith—that he was using the presidency to build their movement. 
They mistook a salesman for a true believer. 
He didn’t see a financial revolution. 
He saw marks for a new grift. 
If you judge the crypto industry’s bet by political access, it has been a spectacular success. 
But if you judge it by investment returns, it’s more of a disaster. 
And if you judge it by who is actually getting rich, there may never have been a better investment than becoming the crypto president. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%kos: 6.5%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.6%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 1.0%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.4%kos: 1.5%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.4%This article: 4.3%kos: 2.6%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.3%This article: 5.6%kos: 5.7%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%kos: 1.1%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 1.6%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%kos: 11.2%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.9%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%kos: 3.1%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error7.6%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.4%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.1%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%kos: 2.6%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.8%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.5%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 1.2%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%kos: 3.1%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 3.7%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.9%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%kos: 12.6%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.9%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon2.9%This article: 3.3%kos: 5.3%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 0.0%kos: 1.6%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%kos: 2.3%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.1%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.1%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 5.0%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 2.5%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 20.1%kos: 21.4%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice20.1%This article: 0.0%kos: 3.1%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 9.5%kos: 5.6%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%kos: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%kos: 1.7%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

728 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.6%attributed speech709writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

68%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words100% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.6 ptsWriter: 20.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.