An Upstate woman was reported missing in June. Her skeletal remains were just found. 1%

By Christian Smith

8/5/2026, 10:45:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (30,356 of 30,396 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the article peer group.

CAMPOBELLO  Authorities have found the skeletal remains of a woman who was reported missing in late June. 
Tamara Nicole “Nicki” Evans, 39, was reportedly last seen at noon June 26 leaving a residence on Melvin Hill Road, according to the Spartanburg County Sheriff’s Office. 
She was staying at a residence on that road, a recent news release from the Spartanburg County Coroner’s Office said. 
On Aug. 3, during an investigation into Evans’ disappearance, the sheriff’s violent crimes unit found human remains in a wooded area off Melvin Hill Road, said a separate news release from the sheriff’s office. 
The remains, which Spartanburg Coroner Rusty Clevenger characterized as “skeletal,” have been identified as Evans’. 
“The Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office extends its deepest condolences to Ms. 
Evans' family and loved ones during this difficult time,” officials said in the news release. 
The investigation is still active, the sheriff’s office said. 
More information was not immediately released. 
Similarly, the coroner’s office said it would be following up with more details from the investigation in the days and weeks to come, before a ruling is made on the manner of death. 
Because the remains were skeletonized, an anthropology exam has been planned, Clevenger said. 
“I ask you keep the family and friends of Mrs. 
Evans in your thoughts and prayers during their time of loss and grief,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.9%Optimism Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.9%Negativity Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.3%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion21.3%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.3%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.9%Unattributed Quote11.3%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 10.4%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.3%Indoctrination10.4%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian Smith: 0.0%Post and Courier: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

240 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers87%attributed speech32writer words
Selected voice

Rusty Clevenger

47%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words25% of attributed speech19% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+47.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rusty Clevenger: 47.2%47.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.