The Data Center Gold Rush and the Communities Standing in the Way 

5/20/2026, 5:34:25 PM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Communities across the country are pushing back against these massive projects. 
Over the last year, the number of local bans against data centers has grown nearly ten fold. 
And yet, three projects currently in the works in Utah face stiff opposition from local residents. 
At the same time, the demand for AI infrastructure is only accelerating. 
So, as resistance grows, is there any real sign the hew and cry is slowing down the data center build out? 
GUESTS 
Art Raymond | Business reporter, Deseret News 
Karen Weise | Technology correspondent, New York Times 
Airdate: May 21 and 23, 2026 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic15.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 54.1%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect54.1%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.8%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias10.8%This article: 18.9%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias18.9%This article: 39.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias39.6%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.8%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 18.9%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma18.9%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.3%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization15.3%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.8%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion10.8%This article: 18.9%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question18.9%This article: 10.8%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.4%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal14.4%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 36.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote36.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 44.1%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice44.1%This article: 18.9%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination18.9%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

111 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers14%attributed speech96writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageArt Raymond • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKaren Weise • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Karen Weise

0%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words53% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-51.0 ptsWriter: 51.0%Karen Weise: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-41.7 ptsWriter: 41.7%Karen Weise: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-21.9 ptsWriter: 21.9%Karen Weise: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.