KUER0%

The costs of surging water into drought-depleted Lake Powell will be widespread 79%

By Associated Press60%

4/22/2026, 7:40:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 991 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,548 of 21,230 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the article peer group.

Canyons in eastern Utah will churn this spring with huge volumes of water  as much as 50,000 toilets flushing constantly at the same time  in a desperate attempt to maintain electricity generation for thousands of homes across much of the Western U.S. 
The Green and Colorado rivers' flows might seem like a bounty of moisture in a parched desert of sandstone arches and prickly cacti, but in fact, it's just the opposite. 
After the driest winter on record, officials this spring want to raise the level of badly depleted Lake Powell on the Colorado River to keep its hydropower humming. 
To do so, they plan to eventually let out as much as a third of the water in Flaming Gorge Reservoir upstream on the Green River in Wyoming and Utah, which would exceed a record 2022 surge that kept electricity flowing. 
Lake Powell, held back by Glen Canyon Dam, supplies inexpensive and carbon-free electricity to more than 350,000 homes. 
But it comes at a growing cost elsewhere in a contested river basin relied upon heavily by ranchers, industries and some 40 million residential water customers. 
At Flaming Gorge in southwestern Wyoming, Buckboard Marina owners Tony and Jen Valdez are eyeing water levels expected to decline by 10 feet by late summer because of the releases. 
It will mean an ever-longer drive to the water's edge to launch boats. 
“Of course, we’re concerned,” Jen Valdez said. 
“And it will probably get to a point where we’ll need to be more concerned.” 
A balancing act to keep up power production 
If everything goes to plan  and with no relief from the weather  Flaming Gorge will fall by as much as 27 feet a year from now, leaving Buckboard Marina even more high and dry. 
Though it's likely only a temporary solution amid long-term drought, there will be effects downstream, too, as U.S. 
Bureau of Reclamation water managers plan to keep more water than usual from flowing out of Lake Powell on the Arizona-Utah line. 
Downstream, Lake Mead near Las Vegas is on track to resemble the lows of four years ago that revealed formerly submerged boats and human remains. 
The drastic measures are necessary to keep the Powell waterline high enough to run the power-generation turbines without air getting into the system and causing damage, federal officials say. 
Hydropower is a renewable resource  when there's water 
From cities and tribes to rural electric cooperatives and public utility districts, some 155 customers receive hydropower electricity from Glen Canyon Dam and other federal generators. 
None relies 100% on hydropower. 
Many are in disadvantaged communities and all are not-for-profit entities that pay for, among other things, the costs to operate and maintain the dam and the federal government's investments in it. 
The federal Western Area Power Administration has contractual obligations to provide a certain amount of electricity to its customers. 
A loss of hydropower would require WAPA to seek power elsewhere that likely would be more expensive and not renewable, said Leslie James, executive director of the nonprofit Colorado River Energy Distributors Association. 
“If Glen Canyon hydropower is reduced to zero or a low amount, it will have different impacts on what they charge communities,” James said. 
It's a situation James said she hasn't seen in her 48 years helping electricity customers in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. 
Replacing federal hydropower with market purchases has forced rate increases for the past five years at Heber Light & Power southeast of Salt Lake City, with the latest increase hitting 13%, said Emily Brandt, the utility’s energy resource manager. 
Keeping Lake Powell up could bring environmental costs 
Increasingly frequent drought, evaporation and water demand  especially to irrigate alfalfa for the cattle industry  have shrunk the level of Lake Powell to 3,526 feet (1,075 meters) above sea level  just 23% of full capacity. 
To keep generating power, the reservoir can't fall below 3,490 feet (1,200 meters), which is the level of the water intakes for Glen Canyon Dam's electricity generators. 
That has never happened since the 710-foot (220-meter) dam was completed in 1963 and Lake Powell was gradually filled to full capacity in 1980. 
In 2022, the Bureau of Reclamation released an unprecedented 500,000 acre-feet (617 million cubic meters) of water from Flaming Gorge to raise Lake Powell. 
The latest Flaming Gorge releases to maintain Lake Powell's power generation could eventually total double that amount. 
Meanwhile, the plan to hold back 1.5 million acre-feet (1.85 billion cubic meters) in Lake Powell will result in the Hoover Dam producing 40% less electricity at an even lower Lake Mead downstream. 
Another downside: Warm water from Lake Powell's surface could encourage the spread of smallmouth bass, an invasive fish that competes with a threatened native species, the humpback chub, in the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam. 
Groups, including the Grand Canyon Trust, urge water managers to mix in deeper, cooler water to keep the Grand Canyon inhospitable to smallmouth bass. 
A decades-long trend of worsening drought 
The strongest releases from Flaming Gorge in the days and weeks ahead will be calibrated to help native fish in the Green River, a Colorado River tributary. 
Eventually, Flaming Gorge will dip from 83% full to an estimated 59% full. 
The 2022 releases from Flaming Gorge were followed by a wet winter, which alleviated water worries across the region for a time. 
“We kind of got saved by Mother Nature,” said Valdez, the Buckboard Marina owner. 
A wet year or two won't be enough to reverse a quarter-century-long "megadrought" resulting at least in part from human-caused climate change. 
But Valdez is optimistic that wet weather will return like before. 
“Hopefully, we can expand into doing some other things,” Valdez said. 
“Because it’s going to come back eventually.” 
This story was written by Mead Gruver and Dorany Pineda of the Associated Press 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Associated Press: 2.2%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias1.7%This article: 2.4%Associated Press: 3.1%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.6%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias1.4%This article: 3.3%Associated Press: 1.1%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 3.9%Associated Press: 7.2%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 2.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 7.4%Associated Press: 1.5%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias7.4%This article: 7.6%Associated Press: 8.8%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 2.4%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.7%Associated Press: 3.4%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 3.6%Associated Press: 0.6%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.7%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring1.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Associated Press: 4.7%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.7%Associated Press: 2.3%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.8%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal1.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Associated Press: 1.2%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Associated Press: 1.3%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 20.5%Associated Press: 3.0%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice20.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

991 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers24%attributed speech752writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJen Valdez • 7 words • 100.0% coverageJen Valdez • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageBureau of Reclamation • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWestern Area Power Administration • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLeslie James • 33 words • 0.0% coverageLeslie James • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Brandt • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBureau of Reclamation • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageGrand Canyon Trust • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTony and Jen Valdez • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTony and Jen Valdez • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTony and Jen Valdez • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Emily Brandt

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words16% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-27.0 ptsWriter: 27.0%Emily Brandt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.