BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 1,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 628 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (9,536 of 28,846 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the article peer group.

Grassroots organizers and South Bay political leaders drew together for a rally in San Jose’s Japantown Wednesday in a show of unified opposition against a planned ICE facility taking shape in South County. 
The rally held in front of the historic Issei Memorial Building took place as state and local leaders wage a legal battle to halt work on the still-under-construction immigration center that planning documents suggest will include extensive detention facilities. 
Over nearly an hour of sometimes tear-filled remarks, a series of speakers  made up of community activists and a who’s who of South Bay political leaders  drew parallels between the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown and historic wrongs perpetrated against Japanese Americans, such as the mass internment policy enacted during World War II. 
“Today, unfortunately, it’s too late to just say never again,” Susan Hayase, co-founder of Japantown social justice group San Jose Nikkei Resisters, said during the rally. 
“The thing we feared is happening again now.” 
While striking a note of alarm, Hayase also suggested that people organizing against the federal government’s mass deportation efforts could draw inspiration from the decades-long struggle waged by Japanese Americans to secure civil rights. 
“Even in the concentration camps, our people resisted and protested with labor strikes, draft resistance, hunger strikes and refusal to participate in government loyalty oaths,” Hayase said. 
“In that same spirit, we can and should protest, object and resist today’s brutal, unlawful ICE policies.” 
In holding Wednesday’s rally, organizers such as Hayase are adding their voices to the chorus of opposition against the planned U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility at 7240 Holsclaw Road just outside Gilroy. 
Since news of the project first surfaced in May, immigrants rights groups have held several protests and marches throughout Santa Clara County and beyond. 
“We see that our communities will suffer together as they always have,” Rebeca Armendariz, a former Gilroy councilmember who has emerged as a lead organizer in the opposition movement against the planned facility, said at the rally. 
“But that’s why together we will gather, we will strategize, we will organize and continue to fight together  so that we will win back our country.” 
The Japantown rally came two days after a coalition of city and county governments  ranging from the North Bay down to the Central Coast  submitted an amicus brief that signaled official support for a lawsuit seeking to block the planned ICE facility. 
The lawsuit  brought in June by Santa Clara County and California Attorney General Rob Bonta  alleges the federal government has advanced the project in secrecy, violating federal environmental laws as well as local rules restricting the Holsclaw Road property to agricultural uses . 
Earlier this month, federal authorities agreed to pause work at the site until court proceedings begin in early September. 
Representatives for the U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have previously denied any plans to build detention facilities on the property and claim the agency seeks only to construct a new office. 
But that contradicts blueprints outlining plans to construct an ICE facility with detention areas large enough to hold 150 people, according to an assessment by county officials. 
To date, the Bay Area has not seen the same dramatic immigration enforcement operations that have rocked major cities such as Minneapolis, Chicago and Los Angeles since President Donald Trump began his second term . 
But Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, whose district includes Japantown as well as Gilroy, warned that could change if the Holsclaw Road facility ever becomes operational. 
“What it’s going to mean is that those masked, armed, dangerous agents can fan out across Northern California and bring their reign of terror to our communities,” Lofgren said. 
“We cannot allow that to happen.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.0%Keith Menconi: 1.1%Mountain View Voice: 1.9%Confirmation Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Keith Menconi: 5.0%Mountain View Voice: 2.1%Availability Heuristic12.9%This article: 5.6%Keith Menconi: 0.8%Mountain View Voice: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.1%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 1.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Keith Menconi: 2.4%Mountain View Voice: 2.7%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 1.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.4%Keith Menconi: 0.8%Mountain View Voice: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Keith Menconi: 1.8%Mountain View Voice: 2.6%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 8.9%Keith Menconi: 4.3%Mountain View Voice: 1.4%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 20.9%Keith Menconi: 5.3%Mountain View Voice: 3.0%Negativity Bias20.9%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.5%Mountain View Voice: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Keith Menconi: 4.3%Mountain View Voice: 1.4%In-Group Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Keith Menconi: 1.5%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Recency Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.3%Keith Menconi: 1.3%Mountain View Voice: 1.4%Appeal to Authority11.3%This article: 1.0%Keith Menconi: 1.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.8%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 8.4%Keith Menconi: 2.3%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Slippery Slope8.4%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Keith Menconi: 2.4%Mountain View Voice: 2.3%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.6%Keith Menconi: 2.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Bandwagon8.6%This article: 16.9%Keith Menconi: 6.3%Mountain View Voice: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 1.3%Keith Menconi: 0.8%Mountain View Voice: 0.5%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.8%Mountain View Voice: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.3%Keith Menconi: 0.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Composition/Division4.3%This article: 8.6%Keith Menconi: 1.0%Mountain View Voice: 1.7%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.7%Mountain View Voice: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.2%Mountain View Voice: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.4%Mountain View Voice: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.8%Keith Menconi: 1.4%Mountain View Voice: 1.0%Indoctrination6.8%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 2.0%Mountain View Voice: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.3%Mountain View Voice: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Keith Menconi: 0.1%Mountain View Voice: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

628 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers42%attributed speech365writer words
Selected voice

Zoe Lofgren

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words22% of attributed speech78% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.