Gizmodo58%

Sam Neill 48%

By Germain Lussier46%

7/13/2026, 6:41:20 AM

Keywords: Obituary, Sam Neill

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 746 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,198 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the article peer group.

Sam Neill, Star of ‘Jurassic Park’ and ‘Event Horizon,’ Has Died 
The New Zealand born actor, who also appeared in 'Omen III,' 'Dead Calm,' and many others, was 78. 
Published July 13, 2026, 2:41 am ET 
Reading time 3 minutes 
Sam Neill, star of Jurassic Park, has passed way at 78. 
© Universal 
Sam Neill, one of the most versatile, charismatic, and recognizable actors in the world, passed away Monday morning at the age of 78. 
“It is with immense sadness that the whānau of Sam Neill share the news of his passing on Monday 13th July, in Sydney, Australia,” a post on Neill’s official Instagram read. 
“Sam was surrounded by family and passed with the dignity that has characterized his whole life. 
The loss was sudden and unexpected, but blessed by the fact that Sam remained cancer-free. 
They would like to express their deepest gratitude to the staff at St Vincent’s Private Hospital for their incredible care. 
More details will be shared later, but for now, on behalf of the family, we ask that you respect their privacy as they navigate this immeasurable loss.” 
Born in 1947, Neill began acting in the mid-1970s, with one of his most notable early roles being the devilish Damien on Omen III: The Final Conflict. 
From there, he crafted a vast and varied career with roles in the George Miller-produced Dead Calm, alongside Sean Connery in The Hunt for Red October , and in John Carpenter’s Memoirs of an Invisible Man, to name a few. 
By the early 1990s, Neill had become famous and recognizable enough to be cast in the role that would define his entire career, Dr. 
Alan Grant in Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park . 
Neill gave Grant an incredible blend of aw-shucks enthusiasm, infinite curiosity, and relatable bravery, instantly creating a truly timeless character. 
Who can forget the way he took off those sunglasses or described velociraptor dinner? 
The character returned in Jurassic Park III and, most recently, in Jurassic World Dominion, when io9 got a chance to speak with him. 
“It’s interesting. 
You don’t get many chances to play one character over 30 years. 
That’s pretty strange, isn’t it?” 
Neill told us. 
“But I think it’s true for all three of those legacy characters, [myself], Laura, and Jeff. 
Jeff’s character is still really annoying and won’t shut up, and Alan finds him infuriating. 
He’s still hopelessly in love with Ellie. 
So things haven’t changed that much. 
They’re just older and not much wiser.” 
As Neill got older and wiser, his career continued to be diversee and wonderful. 
He followed up Jurassic Park with another long list of incredible roles in work such as John Carpenter’s In the Mouth of Madness, Paul Anderson’s Event Horizon , the popular magic miniseries Merlin , Robert Redford’s The Horse Whisperer, and so many more. 
By then, every time you saw Sam Neill’s name on a poster, you trusted that the movie would be good, because he was that good. 
More recently, Neill collaborated with fellow New Zealander Taika Waititi for several films, most notably Hunt for the Wilderpeople . 
In that film, Neill once again showed that even near the end of his career, he could still deliver an incredibly rounded, profound heroic performance. 
And, along the way, he was always wonderful and humble. 
Case in point, we’ll never get over this story Neill told us back in 2022 . 
“I was walking through a shopping center the other day, a big shopping mall, and there was this music playing. 
And I thought, ‘That’s kind of familiar music.’ 
And the person I was with said, ‘Do you recognize this music?’ 
I said, ‘It seems familiar.’ 
And they said, ‘You’re so silly; this is the theme for Jurassic Park, for goodness sake.’ 
Oh, yeah, you’re right. 
You’re right.” 
Next year, Neill will be seen in the film Godzilla X Kong: Supernova . 
So at least we aren’t done seeing him on the big screen. 
But the world is a less beautiful place today than it was yesterday. 
Want more io9 news? 
Check out when to expect the latest Marvel , Star Wars , and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV , and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who . 
Explore more on these topics 
Sign up for our newsletters 
Subscribe and interact with our community, get up to date with our customised Newsletters and much more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 2.2%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.2%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Germain Lussier: 3.6%Gizmodo: 3.0%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 11.1%Germain Lussier: 1.4%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic11.1%This article: 3.2%Germain Lussier: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.2%This article: 4.8%Germain Lussier: 2.6%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 2.2%Gizmodo: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Germain Lussier: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.6%This article: 0.8%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Germain Lussier: 4.4%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 4.7%Germain Lussier: 0.8%Gizmodo: 2.2%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 16.8%Germain Lussier: 2.5%Gizmodo: 7.6%Negativity Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.0%Germain Lussier: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.0%This article: 2.7%Germain Lussier: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Germain Lussier: 8.5%Gizmodo: 2.8%Halo Effect18.6%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.0%Germain Lussier: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias11.0%This article: 5.8%Germain Lussier: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.1%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.6%Gizmodo: 4.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.2%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.2%This article: 2.4%Germain Lussier: 4.0%Gizmodo: 5.4%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.3%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 3.0%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.5%Gizmodo: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.1%Germain Lussier: 1.5%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal9.1%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.9%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.7%Germain Lussier: 4.8%Gizmodo: 4.7%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 4.2%Germain Lussier: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 38.9%Germain Lussier: 7.5%Gizmodo: 13.6%Biased Writer Voice38.9%This article: 3.6%Germain Lussier: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Germain Lussier: 7.0%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.5%

746 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech641writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageInstagram • 31 words • 100.0% coverageInstagram • 16 words • 100.0% coverageInstagram • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSt Vincent’s Private Hospital • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageio9 • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Instagram

100%flagged-word coverage
62 attributed words59% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote+73.0 ptsWriter: 2.8%Instagram: 75.8%75.8%Quote-first Misdirection+50.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Instagram: 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-42.1 ptsWriter: 42.1%Instagram: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Instagram: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Instagram: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.