Raw Story93%

'The irony': Trump social media guru whines as 'hysterical' influencers turn on president 41%

By Jordan Green41% Investigative Reporter64%

7/6/2026, 11:45:50 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 3,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,358 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,907 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the article peer group.

The online “troll” credited with manufacturing support for Donald Trump is upset that the right-wing discourse on social media surrounding the agreement to end the war in Iran appears to be manufactured  and not by him. 
Alex Bruesewitz, a 29-year-old social media strategist who now works for one of the president’s political action committees, went on Tucker Carlson’s podcast in late June to try to mend fences with the breakaway MAGA faction angered by the war with Iran  while suggesting that critics of the plan to end the war are part of “coordinated influence campaigns.” 
“I believe there definitely is a coordinated effort to put pressure on the president and the administration to continue the conflict in Iran,” Bruesewitz told Carlson. 
“And I believe there is even potentially foreign influence involved.” 
Bruesewitz also used Carlson’s platform and an appearance the same day on a podcast hosted by David Freiheit to defend the administration’s disastrous handling of the release of files related to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 
As with criticism of the plan to wind down the war with Iran, Bruesewitz suggested that right-wing anger directed at the administration over the Epstein files has been manipulated in some way. 
“I think giving control of the government process to a handful of hysterics on social media is bad,” Bruesewitz told Carlson. 
“I think it was bad for Epstein  with the Epstein files. 
I think it’s bad right now for all of the hawks who are continuing to press the administration to continue the war.” 
Bruesewitz lamented to Frei that there are “a lot of low-IQ, hysterical takes on social media that pollute discourse,” while complaining to Carlson that “there’s a lot of money from special interest groups, from foreign countries that have poured into [the] internet ecosystem, and I don’t think it’s been healthy for our democracy, for our country.” 
Left unsaid on either podcast was that Bruesewitz’s firm, X Strategies, receives $25,000 a month from Never Surrender, a political action committee affiliated with the president, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. 
Neither of the right-wing podcasters highlighted the fact that Bruesewitz has a history of running the same kind of coordinated influence campaigns that he now appears to be decrying. 
As Trump’s social media advisor during the 2024 campaign, Bruesewitz reportedly encouraged JD Vance, then the vice presidential running mate, to promote the baseless and racist claim that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio were eating pets. 
Bruesewitz told Freiheit last week that he got involved in political consulting as a conservative kid in Wisconsin “through trolling.” 
“Eleven years later I’m still trolling in some capacity,” he added. 
Shortly after Vance pushed the claim about Haitians eating pets on X, Trump infamously jumped on the racist conspiracy theory. 
“They’re eating the dogs; the people that came in, they’re eating the cats,” he said during his debate with Democratic nominee Kamala Harris on Sept. 
10, 2024. 
Bruesewitz had a “war room” of influencers at the ready to amplify Trump’s messaging during the debate, as previously reported by Raw Story. 
Before the debate had even started, Chaya Raichik  owner of the Libs of TikTok account and one of the influencers assembled by Bruesewitz  posted a link to a story purporting to substantiate the claim by citing a call to police reporting about Haitian migrants carrying geese. 
The post, which was viewed 3 million times, concluded: “The media has been telling us this is all a lie.” 
During a campaign rally in Pennsylvania later that month, Trump told supporters “you have to get them the hell out,” and soon pledged to rescind temporary protected status for Haitian migrants. 
Last summer, the Trump Department of Homeland Security announced it was ending temporary protected status for roughly 520,000 Haitians living in the United States. 
And in late June  one day before Bruesewitz appeared on Carlson’s show to complain about “a handful of hysterics” exercising control over government  the Supreme Court issued a ruling upholding the Trump administration’s authority to deport Haitians. 
Bruesewitz is also credited with arranging for Trump to appear on a slate of podcasts during the final month of the 2024 campaign, helping the president boost his performance with young, male voters. 
Bruesewitz’s apparent effort on Trump’s behalf to mend fences with Carlson suggests the president and his allies recognize they’ve lost control over the discourse on right-wing social media, and are seeking to reassert influence. 
Bruesewitz explained to Freiheit that he decided to intervene in the MAGA schism over the Iran war because he’s seeing it tear Trump’s political coalition apart. 
“And I’ve watched it splinter this once unbeatable juggernaut,” Bruesewitz said. 
“We used to have this unified movement on social media that was used to focus on the real mission at hand that was saving our country from the communists and the radical left lunatics that want to destroy it.” 
Bruesewitz’s appearance on Carlson’s show came only days after the popular conservative commentator announced he will not support the Republican Party, as it fights to maintain control of Congress during the upcoming midterm elections. 
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former congresswoman who hired Bruesewitz to work on her 2020 campaign, followed Carlson’s lead. 
Bruesewitz and Carlson did not discuss Carlson's withdrawal of support for the GOP, but Bruesewitz told Carlson he was “slightly disappointed with Marjorie’s recent pivot.” 
To Freiheit, Bruesewitz swatted away concerns that the defections could hurt Republican candidates during the midterms. 
“At the end of the day you’re either going to ride with Trump and us for the next two years, or you’re going to let the radical left lunatics take back control,” he said. 
Vance has also attempted to mend fences with MAGA’s non-interventionist wing through an appearance last month on “The Megyn Kelly Show,” while counter-signaling Israeli officials following the announcement the U.S. had reached an agreement with Iran to end the war. 
Bruesewitz could not be reached for comment for this story, but he told Freiheit: “I’m supporting the Trump administration. 
JD Vance is the president’s vice president, and he is promoting the president’s [memorandum of understanding]. 
Period. 
Full stop. 
So, I am supporting the president’s MOU.” 
The White House did not provide an on-the-record response to Raw Story’s questions about Bruesewitz’s media tour, and emails to Never Surrender, the Trump political action committee that is paying Bruesewitz’s firm, went unreturned. 
During his appearances on Carlson and Freiheit’s podcasts, Bruesewitz singled out a pro-Israel influencer named Eyal Yakoby, who campaigned for Trump during the 2024 election, while suggesting Yakoby is part of a broader influence operation. 
“Many of those same accounts who have spent the last many months criticizing Tucker and Megyn all turn against the vice president and the president’s MOU almost in a coordinated effort,” Bruesewitz told Freiheit. 
“So, of course that raises some suspicion.” 
Bruesewitz said Yakoby has made about 1,200 posts that are critical of Carlson. 
“He’s certainly been paid for some of his tweets,” Bruesewitz told Carlson, adding that he didn’t have evidence that Yakoby has been paid specifically for posts that criticize Carlson or the memorandum of understanding to end the war with Iran. 
To Freiheit, Bruesewitz asked whether it was Yakoby’s “full-time job” to post about Carlson. 
Yakoby acknowledged to Raw Story that he has received payments from marketing agencies, which he declined to identify, for some of his social media posts. 
But he said he hasn’t received compensation from any entity for posts criticizing Carlson or raising questions about the MOU. 
“Every single thing that Alex has accused me and others of, he is literally guilty of,” Yakoby told Raw Story. 
“That’s the irony of it.” 
During his appearance on Carlson’s show, Bruesewitz repeatedly alleged that “foreign influence” is behind online posts pressuring Trump to prolong the war with Iran, while citing information previously reported by the Intercept that Trump’s former campaign manager has been paid by the Israeli government to push pro-Israel views through conservative media. 
But Bruesewitz acknowledged to Carlson that he has no evidence that Yakoby is involved in that campaign. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.8%Jordan Green: 4.2%Rawstory: 8.4%Confirmation Bias21.8%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Jordan Green: 2.2%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 10.3%Jordan Green: 1.7%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.3%This article: 2.5%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias2.5%This article: 19.7%Jordan Green: 2.5%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias19.7%This article: 5.3%Jordan Green: 5.3%Rawstory: 13.4%Framing Effect5.3%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.8%This article: 30.9%Jordan Green: 13.1%Rawstory: 21.6%Negativity Bias30.9%This article: 7.5%Jordan Green: 0.7%Rawstory: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias7.5%This article: 2.7%Jordan Green: 0.6%Rawstory: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 1.5%Jordan Green: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias1.5%This article: 7.0%Jordan Green: 1.9%Rawstory: 2.5%In-Group Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 1.4%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Jordan Green: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.8%Recency Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Jordan Green: 3.9%Rawstory: 6.3%Ad Hominem12.6%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.1%Jordan Green: 2.2%Rawstory: 4.1%Appeal to Authority7.1%This article: 2.5%Jordan Green: 1.2%Rawstory: 3.0%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.7%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.7%This article: 9.9%Jordan Green: 7.2%Rawstory: 12.1%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 2.7%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring2.7%This article: 1.5%Jordan Green: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.8%Bandwagon1.5%This article: 20.0%Jordan Green: 4.9%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion20.0%This article: 2.4%Jordan Green: 0.4%Rawstory: 1.6%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 18.3%Jordan Green: 2.6%Rawstory: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.3%This article: 3.6%Jordan Green: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque3.6%This article: 18.3%Jordan Green: 2.4%Rawstory: 1.7%Burden of Proof18.3%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.8%Jordan Green: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.5%Composition/Division3.8%This article: 3.5%Jordan Green: 1.6%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal3.5%This article: 2.9%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman2.9%This article: 4.6%Jordan Green: 1.7%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.2%Jordan Green: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading1.2%This article: 1.5%Jordan Green: 1.4%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy1.5%This article: 9.6%Jordan Green: 3.9%Rawstory: 5.3%Unattributed Quote9.6%This article: 7.1%Jordan Green: 1.3%Rawstory: 4.1%Quote-first Misdirection7.1%This article: 9.8%Jordan Green: 7.5%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice9.8%This article: 9.5%Jordan Green: 1.9%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination9.5%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 1.7%Rawstory: 8.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.3%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jordan Green: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1358 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers41%attributed speech803writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 60 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 26 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 20 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 34 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 40 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Bruesewitz • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEyal Yakoby • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEyal Yakoby • 20 words • 0.0% coverageEyal Yakoby • 20 words • 0.0% coverageEyal Yakoby • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alex Bruesewitz

94%flagged-word coverage
405 attributed words73% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination+31.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alex Bruesewitz: 31.9%31.9%Biased Writer Voice-16.6 ptsWriter: 16.6%Alex Bruesewitz: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+3.9 ptsWriter: 7.5%Alex Bruesewitz: 11.4%11.4%Quote-first Misdirection+2.4 ptsWriter: 2.5%Alex Bruesewitz: 4.9%4.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.