Mitch McConnell’s Home Gets a Makeover While He’s in the Hospital ⁠66%

By Hafiz Rashid⁠68%

7/10/2026, 8:54:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49.3% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 302 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (7,533 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the article peer group.

Senator Mitch McConnell may be in the hospital for undisclosed reasons, but apparently there’s still work to be done on his house. 
TMZ reports that a man carrying carpet samples was spotted leaving McConnell’s residence in Washington, D.C., Friday. 
Mitch McConnell's D.C. home getting new flooring as he remains hospitalized. pic.twitter.com/FREeemYLC1 
— TMZ (@TMZ) July 10, 2026 
Charlie Cotton, a Washington, D.C. producer for the tabloid website, was at the house to see if he could find any new information about McConnell’s health, which his office has been virtually silent about. 
He spotted the man with carpet samples and spoke to him off camera. 
The man said that in addition to new carpet, new tiles were being considered for the home. 
Speculation and rumors about McConnell’s condition have spread since his hospitalization June 14, with unconfirmed reports stating that he is brain-dead , while his fellow Republicans claim to have had long conversations with him. 
Meanwhile, McConnell’s Senate office hasn’t offered any updates on his health, only saying that he is receiving “excellent care.” 
Video footage from McConnell’s home taken by a neighbor on the day of McConnell’s hospitalization showed a stretcher being led away by first responders, while police had blocked off the street. 
The person’s feet didn’t seem to be moving, and according to the neighbor, the first responders weren’t showing any urgency. 
McConnell lives at his Washington home with his wife, former Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao. 
Why are they replacing its flooring now, when McConnell is in the hospital? 
Does this indicate some kind of change in the senator’s condition? 
Is the family preparing to sell the home? 
As long as McConnell’s family and staff remain silent, news like this will only increase conspiracy theories and rumors. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.2%Hafiz Rashid: 7.5%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias14.2%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 25.8%Hafiz Rashid: 4.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic25.8%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.5%Hafiz Rashid: 10.9%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect18.5%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Hafiz Rashid: 3.0%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias11.6%This article: 49.3%Hafiz Rashid: 16.7%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias49.3%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 17.9%Hafiz Rashid: 2.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error17.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 4.2%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 11.6%Hafiz Rashid: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma11.6%This article: 6.3%Hafiz Rashid: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope6.3%This article: 6.3%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning6.3%This article: 6.6%Hafiz Rashid: 8.6%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Hafiz Rashid: 6.1%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 11.6%Hafiz Rashid: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question11.6%This article: 7.6%Hafiz Rashid: 3.5%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.6%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.3%Hafiz Rashid: 3.9%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal11.3%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.5%Hafiz Rashid: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.5%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.5%Hafiz Rashid: 4.0%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote28.5%This article: 7.3%Hafiz Rashid: 3.1%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection7.3%This article: 48.0%Hafiz Rashid: 14.6%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice48.0%This article: 16.9%Hafiz Rashid: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination16.9%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 7.0%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 22.5%Hafiz Rashid: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias22.5%This article: 0.0%Hafiz Rashid: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

302 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers12%attributed speech266writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageTMZ • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTMZ • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageCharlie Cotton • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

TMZ

74%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words64% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Unattributed Quote+52.9 ptsWriter: 21.1%TMZ: 73.9%73.9%Biased Writer Voice+25.8 ptsWriter: 48.1%TMZ: 73.9%73.9%Politically Right Leaning -25.6 ptsWriter: 25.6%TMZ: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-19.2 ptsWriter: 19.2%TMZ: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%TMZ: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.