GSA sells Old Post Office Building in Washington, once home to Trump hotel 14%

By Eric Revell74%

6/10/2026, 7:07:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 782 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,863 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the article peer group.

The General Services Administration (GSA) on Wednesday announced the sale of the Old Post Office Building located at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. 
The building was the Trump International Hotel from 2016 to 2022 until the Trump family firm sold the leasing rights for $375 million. 
The hotel reopened later in 2022 as the Waldorf Astoria Washington D.C., under the management of Hilton. 
GSA said that its sale of the building included terms that "permanently secured public access to the iconic clock tower while establishing strong protections for the building's architectural heritage through a binding preservation covenant." 
The deal also includes a dedicated fine arts covenant that will retain the American public's ownership of artwork within the building, including Robert Irwin's "48 Shadow Planes" and a historic Benjamin Franklin Statue. 
TRUMP REVEALS NEW WHCA DINNER VENUE AFTER SHOOTING CHAOS DERAILED GALA 
GSA's sale is moving forward under the terms of the existing ground lease, which gives BDT & MSD Partners, a merchant bank, the right of first offer. 
The Wall Street Journal reported that BDT & MSD Partners acquired the building and land for $80 million, according to people familiar with the matter. 
The report noted the bank is discussing selling the property for a total of $400 million. 
Hilton has a long-term agreement in place with the hotel to operate it as the Waldorf Astoria, and that arrangement would continue with a new leaseholder, the Journal reported. 
TRUMP ORGANIZATION CLOSES $375M SALE OF DC HOTEL THAT WILL BECOME A WALDORF ASTORIA 
The Old Post Office Building was completed in 1899 and originally served as the headquarters for the U.S. 
Post Office Department and the post office for Washington, D.C. 
It is listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and its Romanesque Revival architecture makes it one of the most recognizable buildings on Pennsylvania Avenue, featuring a prominent clock tower and atrium. 
It's also located near the White House and other Washington, D.C., landmarks. 
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION EYES DEAL TO CONVERT DC WALDORF-ASTORIA BACK INTO TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL: REPORT 
According to GSA's announcement, before the property was redeveloped into a hotel, taxpayers were absorbing about $6 million a year in losses on the building. 
Since then, there has been over $250 million in private sector capital invested in the property, and taxpayer revenues in the last decade, including the current sale, are expected to exceed $110 million. 
GSA has listed dozens of other federally-owned properties for sale since early last year as the Trump administration looks to reduce federal spending on underutilized office space and real estate. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic5.5%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect16.9%This article: 5.5%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion5.5%This article: 6.7%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias6.7%This article: 5.1%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.1%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect14.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 3.1%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.4%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote22.0%This article: 7.5%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.5%This article: 10.2%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice10.2%This article: 7.3%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias12.2%This article: 4.4%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.4%

451 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers47%attributed speech241writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageGeneral Services Administration (GSA) • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGeneral Services Administration (GSA) • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageGeneral Services Administration (GSA) • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWall Street Journal • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWall Street Journal • 16 words • 100.0% coverageHilton • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGeneral Services Administration (GSA) • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageGeneral Services Administration (GSA) • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Wall Street Journal

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words20% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Wall Street Journal: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.1 ptsWriter: 19.1%Wall Street Journal: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Wall Street Journal: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Wall Street Journal: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.