Missouri will vote on expanding sales taxes so lawmakers can end the state income tax 47%
By Sarah Kellogg38%
4/22/2026, 2:00:00 AM
Topics: Missouri Politics, Tax Policy
BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 995 faulty-reasoning hits from 818 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.4% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,747 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the article peer group.
Missouri voters will decide whether to grant state lawmakers the power to expand sales and use taxes in order to permanently eliminate the state income tax.
Members of the Missouri House voted 95-59 Tuesday to pass a proposed constitutional amendment that gives lawmakers the power to change the taxes.
A handful of Republicans joined House Democrats in voting against the proposal.
Because the House adopted the changes made by the Senate last week, the resolution now goes to Missouri voters.
Proposed constitutional amendments do not need the governor's signature.
"If the people of Missouri want to bound the hands of the legislature that they shall enact legislation which eliminates income taxes, and most permanently eliminates income taxes because it does so in their constitution, then they need to vote for this amendment," said resolution sponsor Rep.
Bishop Davidson, R-Republic.
However, Democrats, like House Minority Leader Ashley Aune, D-Kansas City, said eliminating Missouri's income tax would blow a multi-billion-dollar hole in the state budget.
"Where are we going to get that revenue?
We're going to get that revenue off the backs of Missourians who are living paycheck to paycheck, seniors who already can't afford their medications or to stay in their homes," Aune said.
Proponents of eliminating Missouri's individual income tax say it will make the state more competitive and appealing for businesses and people looking to move to the state.
Republicans like Rep.
Ann Kelley of Lamar called the resolution the first step in the process.
"This is not an overnight change.
This is not a blank check to raise taxes.
In fact, this proposal requires the opposite," Kelley said.
"It requires that an expansion of sales tax be paired with reductions in income tax and reductions at the local level.
That means this is a tax swap, not a tax increase."
Opponents say large hikes on sales and use taxes would be necessary to make up for the billions the state will lose by eliminating the tax.
Additionally, some organizations like AARP say that since most seniors do not pay income taxes in the state, this change would impose more taxes on them.
In a statement released after the House vote on Tuesday, the nonpartisan Missouri Budget Project called the amendment a "misleading tax scheme."
"While the richest Missourians will pad their investment accounts, the vast majority of us will be subject to whopping increased costs for everything from home repairs to car insurance to burial services," Missouri Budget Project President and CEO Amy Blouin said.
According to the legislation, the General Assembly would eliminate the income tax by requiring reductions to the top rate based on revenue growth.
Higher sales and use taxes would likely be necessary to make up for that eventual loss of state revenue.
Once the income tax is eliminated, lawmakers would be unable to reinstate any version of an income tax, unless a different constitutional amendment is passed.
The proposal, which is a key priority of Gov.
Mike Kehoe, gives a five-year window to expand transaction-based taxes, like sales taxes, to make up for lost income tax revenue.
It would be up to lawmakers to change policies to both lower the income tax and raise other taxes to make up for that loss.
Davidson spoke on guardrails the amendment contains, including the five-year deadline.
"If consumption taxes were expanded, they would have to be for the purpose of eliminating the income tax.
That's guardrail one," Davidson said.
"They would have to be revenue neutral.
That's guardrail two.
It would have to be in the same legislation that revenue neutrality is accomplished.
That's guardrail three."
Rep.
Bryant Wolfin, R-Ste.
Genevieve, voted against the legislation.
In speaking against it, he said he did not like how the bill now requires the legislature to take action to eliminate the income tax.
"This is more 'Trust us, we got this.'
And from the people that I'm hearing back at home, that's not the case," Wolfin said,
The proposed amendment will appear on a future ballot, either in a special election or possibly November.
The ballot language reads as follows:
"Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
● Phase-out the individual income tax based on revenue growth;
● Reduce personal property and other local taxes when local revenues increase;
● Modify the sales and use tax to eliminate income tax and reduce local taxes; and
● Protect local funding for public schools and other purposes?"
Rep.
Emily Weber, D-Kansas City, asked Republicans if they would respect the decision of Missouri voters if they rejected the amendment.
"Are you all going to back off, or is this coming back up again next session, and the session after that, and the session after that?
Because again, you all are not listening," Weber said.
The legislation is HJR 173.
Copyright 2026 St.
Louis Public Radio
Speakers
7speakers39%attributed speech498writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageAmy Blouin
41 attributed words13% of attributed speech19% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.