Missouri House passes bill to keep places of worship open during pandemics 13%

By Maggie LeBeau0%

4/10/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, False Dilemma, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 342 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.8% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,072 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the article peer group.

The Missouri House passed a bill 104-38 last week that would allow places of worship to stay open during a health-related state of emergency. 
Legislators passionately debated House Bill 2760, known as the Praise Act, during its final reading in the House. 
Republican bill sponsor Sean Pouche cited the COVID-19 shutdowns that prevented in person worship. 
"When they started those restrictions, they weren't across the board," Pouche said. 
"They picked and choose who got to do what more and we're not taking away that, just keep them all the same on the same playing field." 
Supporters of the bill argued local governments should not be able to restrict religious services and that it is a violation of the First Amendment. 
St. 
Charles Representative Travis Wilson said organized worship is crucial to spiritual health. 
"If I miss a service or two on a Sunday, especially if it's back-to-back, I definitely feel the difference," Wilson said. 
Ferguson Representative Raychel Proudie opposed the bill. 
She argued that people can still practice religion at home, preventing the spread of illness. 
"The Bible speaks to cleanliness," Proudie said. 
"This isn't an attack on religion. 
You should have the Holy Spirit in your home, in your household." 
Eduardo J. 
Simoes is the director of the MU School of Medicine Center for Medical Epidemiology and Population Health. 
He said if in-person religious services were to continue in a pandemic or epidemic, there are ways to mitigate the spread of disease. 
"Not having a person sick coming to church, not creating conditions for overcrowding in a small space, or too many people in a small space, avoid singing, vocalization and keep distance so you don't have physical contact as much as you can," Simoes said. 
He added that virtual services are the safest possible option, but maintaining faith can help one's physical health. 
If an emergency evacuation is ordered, the government would be allowed to restrict religious services during imminent danger. 
The bill now goes to the Senate. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Maggie LeBeau: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 7.8%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.4%Maggie LeBeau: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority9.4%This article: 7.9%Maggie LeBeau: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma7.9%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.5%Maggie LeBeau: 4.4%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization3.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 6.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Maggie LeBeau: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 3.5%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Maggie LeBeau: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

342 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech213writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSean Pouche • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSean Pouche • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTravis Wilson • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRaychel Proudie • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRaychel Proudie • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRaychel Proudie • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageEduardo J. Simoes • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sean Pouche

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words30% of attributed speech12% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Right Leaning -11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Sean Pouche: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.