ICE Took Mom and Dad. Now the Kids Are on Their Own. 46%

By Reveal74%

7/25/2026, 7:01:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.5% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 508 faulty-reasoning hits from 257 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,819 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

Last fall, life for the Perez children was turned upside down. 
Their father, Romeo Sr., was picked up on his way to work and sent to immigration detention. 
A few months later, their mother, Olga, was detained, too. 
Her daughter was driving when they were pulled over. 
Romeo Sr. and Olga were both undocumented and had lived in the United States for decades; their children are US citizens. 
“I just remember after he had started banging on the window, like, telling me that I have to put the windows down so my mom and my uncle can give their IDs,” says 21-year old Eliza Perez. 
She told the officer, “You took my dad, and now you’re taking my mom.” 
With their parents gone, Eliza, Jessica, Romeo Jr., and Cynthia had to fend for themselves in Lake Worth, Florida. 
Eliza, a college student, took charge of the household and the family’s landscaping business. 
The Perezes are not alone. 
An estimated 205,000 kids have had a parent detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the last year and a half. 
It’s happening all over the country and, in some cases, to the same families who were separated at the border during the first Trump administration. 
This week on Reveal , filmmakers Max Maldonado and José Jesús Zaragoza and Mother Jones reporters Samantha Michaels and Isabela Dias look into the lives of two families fighting to stay together as the Trump administration’s deportation agenda rips them apart. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.8%Mother Jones: 4.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.1%Mother Jones: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Reveal: 5.1%Mother Jones: 3.3%Availability Heuristic14.8%This article: 8.6%Reveal: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic8.6%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.5%Mother Jones: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.4%Mother Jones: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 30.4%Reveal: 14.3%Mother Jones: 7.2%Framing Effect30.4%This article: 10.1%Reveal: 2.3%Mother Jones: 0.6%Loss Aversion10.1%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.2%Mother Jones: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Reveal: 4.7%Mother Jones: 1.9%Pessimism Bias16.0%This article: 38.5%Reveal: 14.9%Mother Jones: 9.6%Negativity Bias38.5%This article: 5.4%Reveal: 0.9%Mother Jones: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 2.4%Mother Jones: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.6%Mother Jones: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 2.2%Mother Jones: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.3%Mother Jones: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 2.3%Mother Jones: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.9%Mother Jones: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.9%Mother Jones: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.6%Reveal: 6.5%Mother Jones: 4.7%Hasty Generalization8.6%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.7%Mother Jones: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.2%Mother Jones: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.4%Reveal: 11.9%Mother Jones: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion21.4%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.5%Mother Jones: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.7%Reveal: 0.6%Mother Jones: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 3.4%Mother Jones: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 1.6%Mother Jones: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.4%Reveal: 3.2%Mother Jones: 1.8%Unattributed Quote14.4%This article: 19.8%Reveal: 2.0%Mother Jones: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection19.8%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 9.2%Mother Jones: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 4.7%Mother Jones: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 4.8%Mother Jones: 4.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Reveal: 9.6%Mother Jones: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

257 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech206writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEliza Perez • 37 words • 100.0% coverageEliza Perez • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eliza Perez

100%flagged-word coverage
51 attributed words100% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eliza Perez: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+72.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Eliza Perez: 72.5%72.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.