Missouri's gerrymandered map goes on trial this week. Here’s where the many cases stand84%

By Steve Kraske0% Halle Jackson0%

2/9/2026, 10:35:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 386 faulty-reasoning hits from 305 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,661 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the article peer group.

Is the redrawn congressional map that Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe signed into law last year already in effect? 
That depends on who you ask. 
Republicans have insisted that the new map has already taken effect. 
Passed in a special session in response to pressure from President Donald Trump, the map splits Kansas City into three parts and aims to oust Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II by making his seat harder for a Democrat to win. 
Cleaver has represented Kansas City’s 3rd District since 2005. 
But Richard Von Glahn, executive director of People Not Politicians, a campaign opposing the new map, says Missouri’s map should be on pause under state law. 
The group submitted 300,000 signatures from Missourians requesting a referendum on the map in December  far more than needed  and it’s expected to go to a statewide vote in November. 
“Up until we turned in the signatures… if we turned in signatures, the 2025 map could not go into effect,” Von Glahn told KCUR’s Up To Date. 
“That’s what they testified in federal court. 
It’s what Secretary of State Hoskins’s initial ballot summary said.” 
A lawsuit on that point, led by the ACLU of Missouri, will be heard in court Tuesday. 
That case will decide whether or not the maps are in place before November, and Von Glahn said it could have a big impact on the midterm elections. 
“We're getting to a point where filing for office is going to take place, and we're getting to a point then where we'll get to primary elections,” Von Glahn said. 
“And are we going to be running in districts and voting in the districts that the legislature passed in 2022 or 2025 makes a tremendous difference on how voters should prepare and how candidates should prepare.” 
Richard Von Glahn, executive director of People Not Politicians 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%Steve Kraske: 3.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Steve Kraske: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias9.2%This article: 38.7%Steve Kraske: 6.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect38.7%This article: 11.8%Steve Kraske: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion11.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 8.1%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Steve Kraske: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 7.8%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 4.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Steve Kraske: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias12.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Steve Kraske: 4.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 11.8%Steve Kraske: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma11.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 5.5%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.5%Steve Kraske: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon10.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 7.4%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Kraske: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

305 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.