spiked⁠93%

Who broke Britain? ⁠70%

By spiked⁠0%

7/2/2026, 9:30:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.2% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 226 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,679 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the article peer group.

Miriam Cates – GB News host and former MP – is the latest guest on <em>The Brendan O’Neill Show</em>. 
Miriam and Brendan discuss the chaos at the top of British politics, why the small-boats emergency shames our leaders, and how schools, parents and the state are failing the next generation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%spiked: 7.6%spiked: 8.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.9%spiked: 4.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%spiked: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 64.2%spiked: 26.2%spiked: 8.4%Framing Effect64.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.4%spiked: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%spiked: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.0%spiked: 2.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 64.2%spiked: 35.5%spiked: 13.1%Negativity Bias64.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 58.5%spiked: 8.8%spiked: 3.7%In-Group Bias58.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.6%spiked: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%spiked: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 7.7%spiked: 7.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.6%spiked: 5.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.2%spiked: 4.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.0%spiked: 3.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 58.5%spiked: 16.8%spiked: 15.0%Hasty Generalization58.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%spiked: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.4%spiked: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 58.5%spiked: 19.0%spiked: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion58.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.8%spiked: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.5%spiked: 4.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%spiked: 4.1%spiked: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.1%spiked: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.4%spiked: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 58.5%spiked: 27.4%spiked: 25.8%Biased Writer Voice58.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 7.5%spiked: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 58.5%spiked: 26.3%spiked: 9.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias58.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 28.3%spiked: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

53 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.