BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 599 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.3% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,861 of 23,552 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the article peer group.

Armed Israeli settlers backed by the military and government have continued to escalate attacks on Palestinians living in the West Bank in recent weeks, attacking villages and towns amid an ongoing push to assert Israeli sovereignty over the territory. 
At the same time, there are indications that the “wall of fear” among Palestinians in the West Bank has begun to crumble—as individual Palestinians have engaged in increasingly bold efforts to defend their homes and communities against armed attacks. 
On this week’s stream, **Murtaza Hussain** and **Maysa Mustafa** discuss the situation in the West Bank with **Abdaljawad Omar**, a professor at Birzeit University in the West Bank. 
Later in the show, Murtaza discusses the youth-led, “Cockroach Movement” protests in India against corruption and economic inequality with guests **Akshay Marathe**, former national spokesperson for India’s Aam Aadmi Party, and journalist **Meghnad Bose**. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.0%Drop Site News: 0.2%Drop Site News: 1.9%Confirmation Bias26.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 1.4%Availability Heuristic22.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 32.7%Drop Site News: 0.9%Drop Site News: 2.2%Framing Effect32.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 26.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%Optimism Bias26.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 32.7%Drop Site News: 0.6%Drop Site News: 3.8%Negativity Bias32.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 26.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error26.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Drop Site News: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 2.4%Appeal to Authority26.0%This article: 22.7%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%False Dilemma22.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 52.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 1.4%Hasty Generalization52.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.7%Drop Site News: 0.7%Drop Site News: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 1.1%Anecdotal26.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.6%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 48.7%Drop Site News: 0.2%Drop Site News: 0.2%Unattributed Quote48.7%This article: 18.7%Drop Site News: 0.3%Drop Site News: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection18.7%This article: 32.7%Drop Site News: 0.4%Drop Site News: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice32.7%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Drop Site News: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

150 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.